4.7 Article

Towards delivering on the sustainable development goals in greenhouse production systems

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 169, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105379

Keywords

Greenhouse production; Quantitative assessment; SDGs; Sustainable development; Tomato

Funding

  1. Rockwool Grodan
  2. Australian Research Council's Industrial Transformation Training Centres scheme [IC140100024]
  3. Australian Research Council [IC140100024] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the sustainability of tomato production in four greenhouse systems, finding that high-tech systems show potential for positive contributions towards some SDGs but have high energy use; low-tech systems perform better in terms of energy use; soil-based cultivation systems face issues with low water use efficiency and high nutrient losses; organic cultivation systems have relatively high water and land use.
This review evaluates the sustainability of tomato production in four greenhouse systems: high-tech (The Netherlands) and low-tech (Spain) combined with two ways of cultivation (conventional or organic). The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), as defined by the United Nations, were used as a lens to assess the sustainability of these four greenhouse production systems. In total seven SDGs, including 14 targets, were assessed through 12 quantitative and two descriptive indicators. Conventional, high-tech greenhouse systems showed the greatest potential for positive contributions towards four of the SDGs. However, their relatively high energy use makes it difficult to achieve SDG7 on affordable and clean energy, where low-tech systems perform better due to lower energy use from relatively cleaner sources. Lower water use efficiency and higher nutrient losses in all soilbased cultivation systems are barriers to achieving some targets under most of the selected SDGs. Organic cultivation systems showed relatively high water and land use, based on the limited data available. Our review highlights the existence of substantial synergies, but also considerable trade-offs between SDGs. This needs to be considered when making policy, investment and management decisions related to greenhouse production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available