Journal
RESEARCH IN SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 319-330Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15438627.2021.1966012
Keywords
activity profile; fatigue; GPS; movement strategy; monitoring; velocity
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compared the sensitivity of peak running speed measured during a submaximal run test with a countermovement jump test in measuring neuromuscular fatigue, and the results confirm that peak running speed is a cost-effective and real-time feasible method for measuring neuromuscular fatigue.
This study compared the sensitivity of peak running speed (PRS) measured during a submaximal run test (SRT) with a countermovement jump (CMJ) test to provide an alternate method of measuring neuromuscular fatigue (NMF). The study involved 20 semi-professional academy soccer players who performed a SRT and CMJ test, 24-hours pre-match, 24-, 48-, 72- and 96-hours post-match. Moderate decreases (effect-size (ES) +/- 90% confidence intervals) were observed 24-hours post-match for CMJ(H); ES -0.70 +/- 0.19, CMJ(PV); ES -0.92 +/- 0.27 and PRS; ES -0.58 +/- 0.11 with small decreases in CMJ(H); ES -0.36 +/- 0.13 and PRS; ES -0.27 +/- 0.23 still evident 48-hours post-match before returning to baseline 72-hours post-match. The results confirm PRS as an inexpensive alternate method of measuring NMF which, allows instantaneous real-time feedback on NMF. This can allow changes to be made immediately on-field within the post-match recovery phase without the need for further analysis or equipment.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available