4.4 Article

Prenatal developmental toxicity studies on fumes from oxidised asphalt (OA) in the rat

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 67-79

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.03.003

Keywords

Oxidised asphalt; Fume; Prenatal developmental toxicity; Teratogenicity; Workplace; OECD 414

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rats exposed to fumes of oxidised asphalt did not show prenatal developmental toxicity, however, high-dose exposure resulted in effects on maternal body weight gain, food consumption, lung weights, and histopathological changes in lungs and the upper respiratory tract.
The prenatal developmental toxicity of the fumes of oxidised asphalt (OA) was tested by nose-only inhalation in the rat. The test material was generated by collecting fumes from the headspace of storage tanks filled with OA. The composition of these fumes was matched to fumes sampled at a workplace where the same OA was applied in a pour-and-roll operation, representing occupational exposure with high concentrations of fumes to not underestimate the possible hazard. In the main study, dams were exposed to 0, 53, 158 and 536 mg/m3 of fume (as total organic mass), for 6 h/day for 19 days p.c. The maternal NOAEC was 53 mg/m3 (lowest dose tested). In the high-dose group treatment-related effects on body weight gain were seen. In the mid- and high-dose groups treatment-related effects on food consumption, lung weights, and histopathological changes in lungs and the upper respiratory tract were observed. The NOAEC for prenatal developmental toxicity was 536 mg/m3 since no exposure-related effects were found in any of the exposure groups for any of the investigated reproductive endpoints. Furthermore, nose-only exposure to OA fumes in concentrations up to 536 mg/m3 from days 1-19 p.c. did not induce any significant fetal abnormalities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available