4.7 Article

The asymmetric nexus of renewable energy consumption and economic growth: New evidence from Rwanda

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages 336-346

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.017

Keywords

Renewable energy consumption; Economic growth; Asymmetric analysis; NARDL

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71991482]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201906410051]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for National Universities, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan) [2201710266]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that renewable energy consumption has an impact on economic growth, and observed an asymmetric causality relationship from positive shocks of renewable energy consumption to economic growth, as well as a unidirectional causality effect from agriculture and capital to economic growth.
Existing studies on the impact of renewable energy consumption on economic growth, which was conducted in either middle/high-income countries or mixed sampled countries, produce the effect, but unfeasible in low-income countries. This study examines the asymmetric nexus of renewable energy consumption and economic growth, and the impact of agriculture and capital on economic growth by employing a non-linear autoregressive distributed lagged model (NARDL) and causality test from 1990 to 2015 in Rwanda. The results show evidence that renewable energy consumption affects economic growth. Asymmetric causality relationship, which is running from positive shocks renewable energy consumption to economic growth is noted. Furthermore, the unidirectional causality effect flowing from both agriculture and capital to economic growth for both positive and negative shocks is obtained. Therefore, the Government of Rwanda needs to realize positive economic growth from its investment in renewable energy consumption and agriculture as prior sectors of development. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available