4.7 Article

Analysis of water environment on the performances of floating photovoltaic plants

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages 281-295

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.082

Keywords

Photovoltaic; Floating; Bifacial; Renewable energy; Cooling; Performances; Thermal models

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Education (MIUR) [12/2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Floating PV plants are gaining increasing interest due to advantages such as limited land use, evaporation reduction, and enhanced energy performance compared to ground and rooftop PV systems. Mathematical models were developed and validated to estimate the performance of bifacial and monofacial PV modules on water surfaces, showing that bifacial modules yield higher energy gains than monofacial modules.
There is an increasing interest in Floating PV (FPV) plants thanks to their advantages compared with ground and rooftop PV systems, mainly related to very limited land use, evaporation reduction, and improvement of the energy performance. The PV modules installed on water surfaces have a natural cooling due to the microclimate in which they operate, which reduces thermal power losses. Further-more, they can be equipped with simple and effective forced active water cooling systems which further improve FPVs performance. The objective of this study is to develop and validate mathematical models capable of estimating the performance of bifacial and monofacial PV modules installed on water surfaces. Starting from the energy balances of the PV modules, different scenarios are simulated, such as mono and bifacial systems installed on the rooftop, mono, and bifacial FPV systems in presence of natural (or passive) and forced (or active) cooling. The models are validated against experimental data acquired in FPV systems installed in the Enel Innovation Lab by Enel Green Power, Catania (Italy). The obtained results show an energy gain due to bifaciality of 5.24%. The passive cooling in the FPV increases the energy collected by 3% (maximum obtainable of 6.4%) and 2.6% for the bifacial and monofacial tech-nology respectively. Active cooling in FPVs increases the collected energy by 9.7% (maximum achievable of 13.5%) and 9.5% for the bifacial and monofacial respectively. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available