4.7 Article

Selecting significant contextual factors and estimating their effects on operator reliability in computer-based control rooms

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 213, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107679

Keywords

Empirical data; Computer-based control room; Human reliability analysis; HuREX framework; Performance shaping factor; Regression analysis

Funding

  1. Nuclear Research & Development Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean government, Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2017M2A8A4015291]
  2. HRA - Electric Power Research Institute [10011321]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By collecting and analyzing human reliability data, researchers may gain insights into the reliability of nuclear power plant operators in different contexts and the influencing factors. The study employed multivariable regression analysis, combining 4 strategies to select and estimate the influencing factors, and discussed in detail the effects of six commonly selected contextual variables.
To realistically quantify human reliability and generate concrete evidence for improving man-machine interfaces, the collection and analysis of empirical human reliability data is essential. In this study, we statistically modeled the reliability of nuclear power plant operators under various contexts using data from fully computerized control rooms. The data, obtained from a full-scope simulator of the APR1400 (Advanced Power Reactor 1400 MW) via the HuREX (human reliability data extraction) framework, were analyzed with multivariable regression. To select the significant variables and estimate the effects of the selected variables among 55 candidates, 4 strategies were employed. From this analysis, insights regarding the variable selection and impact estimation processes were obtained. In addition, the effects of six contextual variables that were commonly selected in the different approaches are discussed in detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available