4.7 Article

Optimal defense-attack strategies between M defenders and N attackers: A method based on cumulative prospect theory

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 210, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107510

Keywords

Defense and attack; Cumulative prospect theory; Risk attitude; Game theory

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71971176, 72071005]
  2. Applied Basic Research Program of Sichuan Province [2020YJ0027]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JBK210205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research investigates the system defense of M defenders against N attackers, modeling the problem as a defense-attack game based on cumulative prospect theory. Risk attitudes of defenders and attackers are considered, with analysis of cooperative and non-cooperative behaviors impacting optimal resource allocation. Numerical experiments are conducted for illustration.
This research studies the system defense of M defenders against N attackers. We model this problem as a defense-attack game between M defenders and N attackers based on the cumulative prospect theory. In this game, the defenders can allocate their resources to defend the system from being attacked, and to attack the attackers such that the opponents lose their offensive power. In response, the attackers can allocate its offensive resources to attack the system and defend themselves from being attacked by the defenders. In this research, we use the cumulative prospect value instead of the vulnerability as the performance measure such that the risk attitudes of defenders and attackers can be considered. Further, we study the cooperative behaviors and non-cooperative behaviors of the attackers and analyze the effect on the optimal resource allocation. Numerical experiments are carried out to illustrate the applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available