4.4 Article

Systemic absorption of benzalkonium chloride after maximal use of a consumer antiseptic wash product

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104978

Keywords

Benzalkonium chloride; Systemic absorption; Antimicrobial; Human pharmacokinetic study

Funding

  1. Henkel Corporation, Inc.
  2. Lonza LLC.
  3. Lonza, Inc.
  4. Lonza
  5. Henkel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The in vivo pharmacokinetic study showed that systemic exposure to benzalkonium chloride (BAC) in antimicrobial soap is very low even under maximal use conditions, with levels below the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's identified concern level of 500 ng/L.
An in vivo pharmacokinetic study was conducted using consumer antiseptic wash containing 0.13% benzalkonium chloride (BAC) to assess the effect of dermal absorption on long-term systemic exposure to BAC. The objective of the study was to determine blood levels of BAC under maximal use conditions. Subjects were enlisted to wash their hands 60 s with soap containing 0.13% BAC 30 times per day over an 8-9 h time period for 5 consecutive days. The test product with the highest absorption potential was selected based on market share and results from in vitro permeation testing. Blood plasma was collected from subjects on 32 occasions over the 6-day study period. Plasma samples were analyzed for the C12 and C14 homologs of BAC using LC-MS/MS with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 106.9 and 32.6 ng/L, respectively. For the 32 subjects, C12 homolog was detected above the LLOQ in only four of 1,024 plasma samples at 117.8-191.7 ng/L, and C14 homolog was detected in only one sample at 59.5 ng/L. Consequently, systemic exposure to BAC in antimicrobial soap is very low and below the level of concern identified by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (500 ng/L) even under maximal use conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available