4.7 Article

Structure, adsorption and separation comparison between the thermosensitive block segment polymer modified ReO4- ion imprinted polymer and traditional ReO4- ion imprinted polymer

Journal

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.104929

Keywords

Smart ion imprinted polymer; Morphology; Adsorption property; Thermosensitive segment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation, China [51061009]
  2. Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science
  3. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Nonferrous Metals [18LHZD003, 18LHPY004]
  4. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Nickel and Cobalt Resources Comprehensive Utilization [2019-16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel smart ion imprinted polymer (SIIP) was prepared by introducing a thermosensitive block segment polymer, PDEA, into the ion imprinted polymer matrix, which showed improved adsorption performance and selectivity compared to the ion imprinted polymer without PDEA block segment. The SIIP demonstrated a higher adsorption capacity and separation degree for ReO4- compared to the ion imprinted polymer without PDEA, and showed a better separation effect for Re in secondary superalloys leaching solution.
Y A novel smart ion imprinted polymer (SIIP) introduced a thermosensitive block segment polymer, poly N, N-diethylacrylamide (PDEA), as the smart segment into ion imprinted polymer (IIP) matrix to simultaneously improve the adsorption performance and selectivity. PDEA was synthesized by a reversible additionfragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization, and then it was introduced into the polymerization process to fabricate SIIP. Meanwhile, IIP without PDEA block segment was prepared under similar conditions. Results showed that the morphology of SIIP was composed of tiny fiber, but IIP was composed of small globule. The initiate adsorption capacity (Q) and the separation degree (R) of SIIP to ReO4- were 0.065 mmol/g and 3.25, while that of IIP were 0.06 mmol/g and 3.00. After 11 times recycling, adsorption capacity (Q) and the separation degree (R) of SIIP to ReO4- decreased to 0.043 mmol/g and 2.05, while that of IIP decreased to 0.024 mmol/g and 1.09, and the desorption rate was higher than IIP. Finally, SIIP showed a better separation effect to Re than IIP in the secondary superalloys leaching solution. After a circle of adsorption and desorption, the purity of Re was upped from 36.8413% to 62.9448%, which was higher than IIP (37.1761%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available