4.5 Article

Establishing Quality and Safety in Hospital-based 3D Printing Pro- grams: Patient-first Approach

Journal

RADIOGRAPHICS
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 1208-1229

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA (RSNA)
DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021200175

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The adoption of 3D printing in hospitals is increasing rapidly, but also comes with the risk of potential errors and decreased quality for patients. Establishing a strong quality management system is crucial to improving product quality and reducing errors. Repetitive tasks in traditional care processes can harm patient care in the long run.
The adoption of three-dimensional (3D) printing is rapidly spreading across hospitals, and the complexity of 3D-printed models and devices is growing. While exciting, the rapid growth and increasing complexity also put patients at increased risk for potential errors and decreased quality of the final product. More than ever, a strong quality management system (QMS) must be in place to identify potential errors, mitigate those errors, and continually enhance the quality of the product that is delivered to patients. The continuous repetition of the traditional processes of care, without insight into the positive or negative impact, is ultimately detrimental to the delivery of patient care. Repetitive tasks within a process can be measured, refined, and improved and translate into high levels of quality, and the same is true within the 3D printing process. The authors share their own experiences and growing pains in building a QMS into their 3D printing processes. They highlight errors encountered along the way, how they were addressed, and how they have strived to improve consistency, facilitate communication, and replicate successes. They also describe the vital intersection of health care providers, regulatory groups, and traditional manufacturers, who contribute essential elements to a common goal of providing quality and safety to patients. (C) RSNA, 2021

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available