4.6 Article

Microstructural evolution of proton irradiated Fe-2.25Cr-1Mo characterized using synchrotron XRD (SXRD)

Journal

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109459

Keywords

Ferritic steels; Irradiation; X-ray synchrotron radiation; X-ray diffraction; Microstructure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study utilized synchrotron X-ray diffraction data to analyze microstructural changes in chromium-molybdenum steel samples. Different X-ray diffraction line profile analysis techniques were used to determine the microstructural parameters of irradiated samples, showing that XRDLPA is a powerful tool for reliable extraction of these parameters.
Synchrotron X-ray diffraction data (SXRD) has been used to characterize the microstructural changes in 3.5 MeV proton irradiated 2.25Cr-1Mo (T22) steel samples as a function of dose through different techniques of X-ray diffraction line profile analysis (XRDLPA). Williamson-Hall (W-H) method, modified Rietveld method and convolutional multiple whole profile (CMWP) fitting technique have been used to evaluate the coherent domain size, r.m.s microstrain, dislocation density and dislocation character from SXRD data. It is demonstrated that XRDLPA from SXRD data is a powerful tool for extracting the microstructural parameters of irradiated samples in a reliable manner. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) investigation has been carried out on unirradiated and irradiated samples to corroborate the results of XRDLPA. It is observed that dislocation density increases with dose and forms dislocation loops at highest dose. Vickers microhardness measurement has also been carried out to get the information on the mechanical property changes with dose. The variation in Vickers microhardness as a function of dose has been explained using the results from XRDLPA and TEM analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available