4.5 Article

Focusing on the coach's eye; towards a working model of coach decision-making in talent selection

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102011

Keywords

Coach; Talent; Expertise; Decision-making; Sport

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Talent selection relies heavily on the coach's eye, which is characterized by intuition, subjectivity, experience-based decisions, and a holistic approach. Despite its importance, the underlying mechanisms of the coach's eye remain largely unknown, and there is a lack of connection to theoretical models.
Talent selection has become an integral part of many nations' athlete development systems. In this context, a coach often serves as a decision-maker, selecting or deselecting athletes based on their intuition, a phenomenon that has generally come to be referred to as coach's eye. However, there is no consistent operational definition of this term. To this end, we reviewed prior work using the term coach's eye as reflecting the process of coaches assessing and selecting athletes during talent selection scenarios. Based on previous research, four main characteristics of the coaches' eye were identified: intuitive, subjective, experience-based and holistic. Results emphasize the underlying mechanisms of the coach's eye are still unknown and links to theoretical models are missing. In the final section of this paper, we describe a model from decision-making research, the iCodes model (integrated coherence-based decision and search model) by Jekel, Glo center dot ckner, and Bro center dot der (2018), and apply it to talent selection scenarios. We believe this model provides a useful starting point for investigating the decision process and the underlying mechanisms of the coach's eye.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available