4.7 Review

Interventions to treat fear of childbirth in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 12, Pages 1964-1977

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291721002324

Keywords

Fear of childbirth; interventions; systematic review; tokophobia

Funding

  1. City, University of London, Higher Education Innovation Fund [CRD42018093095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that most interventions can reduce fear of childbirth among women, and other talking therapies may lower the rate of caesarean sections. Future high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed for further validation.
Background Between 5% and 14% of women suffer from fear of childbirth (FOC) which is associated with difficulties during birth and in postnatal psychological adjustment. Therefore, effective interventions are needed to improve outcomes for women. A systematic review and meta-analysis was used to identify effective interventions for treating women with FOC. Methods Literature searches were undertaken on online databases. Hand searches of reference lists were also carried out. Studies were included in the review if they recruited women with FOC and aimed to reduce FOC and/or improve birth outcomes. Data were synthesised qualitatively and quantitatively using meta-analysis. The literature searches provided a total of 4474 citations. Results After removing duplicates and screening through abstracts, titles and full texts, 66 papers from 48 studies were identified for inclusion in the review. Methodological quality was mixed with 30 out of 48 studies having a medium risk of bias. Interventions were categorised into six broad groups: cognitive behavioural therapy, other talking therapies, antenatal education, enhanced midwifery care, alternative interventions and interventions during labour. Results from the meta-analysis showed that most interventions reduced FOC, regardless of the approach (mean effect size = -1.27; z = -4.53, p < 0.0001) and that other talking therapies may reduce caesarean section rates (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.48-0.90). Conclusions Poor methodological quality of studies limits conclusions that can be drawn; however, evidence suggests that most interventions investigated reduce FOC. Future high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed so that clear conclusions can be made.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available