4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Increases in Inpatient Psychiatry Beds Operated by Systems, For-Profits, and Chains, 2010-2016

Journal

PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages 561-564

Publisher

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100182

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AHRQ [U19 HS024072]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [T32MH109433]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined trends in the quantity of inpatient psychiatry beds and facility characteristics. The results showed that the number of psychiatric beds remained relatively stable, but there was an increase in beds operated by systems and for-profit organizations. The net increase in beds was primarily concentrated in for-profit freestanding psychiatric hospitals. The study suggests that payers and policy makers should be cautious of profiteering and further research should investigate the implications of these trends on care quality.
Objective: This study explored trends in the quantity of inpatient psychiatry beds and in facility characteristics. Methods: Using the National Bureau of Economic Research's Health Systems and Provider Database, the authors examined changes in the number of psychiatric facilities and beds, focusing on system ownership, profit status, facility type (general acute care versus freestanding), and affiliation with psychiatric hospital chains from 2010 to 2016. Results: The number of psychiatric beds was relatively unchanged from 2010 (N=112,182 beds) to 2016 (N=111,184). However, the number of beds operated by systems increased by 39.8% (N=15,803); for-profits, by 56.9% (N=8,572); and chains, by 16.7% (N=6,256). Net increases in beds were primarily concentrated in for-profit freestanding psychiatric hospitals. In 2016, most for-profit beds were part of chains (70.2%) and systems (61.3%). Conclusions: Inpatient psychiatry has shifted toward increased ownership by systems, for-profits, and chains. Payers and policy makers should safeguard against profiteering, and future research should investigate the implications of these trends on quality of care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available