4.4 Article

On the Question of the Energetic Performance of TKX-50

Journal

PROPELLANTS EXPLOSIVES PYROTECHNICS
Volume 46, Issue 10, Pages 1504-1508

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prep.202100173

Keywords

dihydroxylammonium 5,5 '-bistetrazole-1,1 '-diolate (TKX-50); enthalpy of formation; detonation velocity; energetic performance

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation through the Agreement with Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry RAS [075-15-2020-803]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TKX-50 exhibits high explosive performance, with slightly lower detonation velocity compared to CL-20 due to overestimation of enthalpy of formation. High-energy composite propellant formulations containing TKX-50 have lower specific impulse than compositions based on CL-20 and HMX.
An analysis of the experimental data available to date shows that the explosive TKX-50 has really high explosive performance characteristics, although not as outstanding as claimed previously, due to the overestimation of the enthalpy of formation. The obtained experimental data on the dependence of the detonation velocity on the density of TKX-50 samples agree with the results of calculations, in which the experimentally determined enthalpy of formation 194.1 kJ mol(-1) is used. The energetic performance of TKX-50 surpasses the parameters of nitramines RDX, HMX, and even CL-20, determined at the same densities. However, the calculated detonation velocity of TKX-50 at theoretical maximum density is 9287 ms(-1), which is slightly lower than the detonation velocity of CL-20 at maximum density. It is worth noting that the detonation velocity of the TKX-50 at the experimentally attainable density (1.8 g cm(-3)) is 9037 ms(-1). Calculations using the experimentally determined enthalpy of formation show that high-energy composite propellant formulations containing TKX-50 are inferior in a specific impulse to compositions based on CL-20 and HMX.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available