4.1 Article

Current status of safety engineering education in China

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 218-225

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prs.12306

Keywords

curriculum; educational evaluation; geographical distribution; safety engineering

Funding

  1. Talent Research Start-up Fund of Nanjing Tech University
  2. University-Industry Collaborative Education Program [202002177004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The overview of Safety Engineering education in China covers the definition, geographical distribution, evaluation analysis, and curriculum setting. Despite the differences in professional characteristic courses offered by various universities, the challenges they face include a lack of engineering practice and professional competitiveness.
An overview of Safety Engineering education in China is conducted. First, definition, research specialty, and development history of Safety Science and Engineering are introduced. Second, a geographical distribution study indicates that universities offering Safety Engineering in mainland China are mainly located in East China, Central North China, and some provinces in West and South China, which is consistent with the latest gross domestic product (GDP) and year-end resident population data. The analysis of evaluation in higher education focuses on engineering education accreditation, first-class discipline construction, and China University Subject Rankings. Third, Safety Engineering curricula in China mainly include general education courses and professional courses. The former is divided into basic education courses and subject education courses, and the latter is divided into professional core courses and professional characteristic courses. The professional characteristic courses offered by various universities are different from each other, mainly due to their research specialties, such as fire safety, chemical safety, mining safety, construction safety, and nuclear safety. Finally, existing challenges, including a lack of engineering practice, lack of systematic course content, and lack of professional competitiveness, are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available