4.7 Article

Parallel evolution of Varroa resistance in honey bees: a common mechanism across continents?

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1375

Keywords

Varroa destructor; Apis mellifera; Varroa resistance; recapping; brood removal; mite infertility

Funding

  1. Bee Diseases Insurance Ltd, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The deadly association between the ecto-parasitic mite and Deformed wing virus has led to the deaths of millions of bee colonies, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere, requiring regular acaricide application for survival. However, an increasing number of bee populations globally have been surviving without mite control methods, showing long-term survival associated with specific traits.
The near-globally distributed ecto-parasitic mite of the Apis mellifera honeybee, Varroa destructor, has formed a lethal association with Deformed wing virus, a once rare and benign RNA virus. In concert, the two have killed millions of wild and managed colonies, particularly across the Northern Hemisphere, forcing the need for regular acaricide application to ensure colony survival. However, despite the short association (in evolutionary terms), a small but increasing number of A. mellifera populations across the globe have been surviving many years without any mite control methods. This long-term survival, or Varroa resistance, is consistently associated with the same suite of traits (recapping, brood removal and reduced mite reproduction) irrespective of location. Here we conduct an analysis of data extracted from 60 papers to illustrate how these traits connect together to explain decades of mite resistance data. We have potentially a unified understanding of natural Varroa resistance that will help the global industry achieve widespread miticide-free beekeeping and indicate how different honeybee populations across four continents have resolved a recent threat using the same suite of behaviours.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available