4.8 Article

Conventional NK cells and tissue-resident ILC1s join forces to control liver metastasis

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2026271118

Keywords

innate lymphocytes metastatic surveillance tissue-resident ILC1s conventional NK cells

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [CRSII5_177208, 310030_175565, PR00P3_179775, 316030_150768, 310030_146130]
  2. Swiss Cancer League [KLS-4098-02-2017, KFS-4431-02-2018]
  3. Promedica Stiftung
  4. University of Zurich (University Research Priority Project Translational Cancer Research)
  5. Monique-Dornonville-de-la-Cour Foundation Zurich
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_175565, PR00P3_179775] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that innate lymphocyte subpopulations cNKs and trILC1s play nonredundant roles in controlling liver metastasis seeding and outgrowth, respectively, and may contribute to developing therapies involving hepatic innate cells.
The liver isa major metastatic target organ, and little is known about the role of immunity in controlling hepatic metastases. Here, we discovered that the concerted and nonredundant action of two innate lymphocyte subpopulations, conventional natural killer cells (cNKs) and tissue-resident type I innate lymphoid cells (trILC1s), is es-sential for antimetastatic defense. Using different preclinical models for liver metastasis, we found that trILC1 controls metastatic seeding, whereas cNKs restrain outgrowth. Whereas the killing capacity of trILC1s was not affected by the metastatic microenvironment, the phenotype and function of cNK cells were affected in a cancer type- specific fashion. Thus, individual cancer cell lines orchestrate the emer-gence of unique cNK subsets, which respond differently to tumor-derived factors. Our findings will contribute to the development of therapies for liver metastasis involving hepatic innate cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available