4.8 Article

Disparate regulation of IMD signaling drives sex differences in infection pathology in Drosophila melanogaster

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2026554118

Keywords

Drosophila melanogaster IMD PGRP-LB infection sexual dimorphism

Funding

  1. Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center [NIH P40 OD018537]
  2. NIH [U41 HG000739]
  3. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/N030117/1]
  4. Wellcome Trust [207467/Z/17/Z]
  5. MRC [MR/R00997X/1]
  6. MRC [MR/R00997X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Wellcome Trust [207467/Z/17/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Male and female animals show differences in infection outcomes, with potential sources of sexually dimorphic immunity being the sex-specific costs of immune activity or pathology. This study found that males and females exhibit differential immune activity but similar bacteria-derived metabolic pathology, with females having a female-specific immune-inducible expression of PGRP-LB which plays a critical role in reducing immune activity in response to bacterial reductions.
Male and female animals exhibit differences in infection outcomes. One possible source of sexually dimorphic immunity is the sexspecific costs of immune activity or pathology, but little is known about the independent effects of immune- versus microbe-induced pathology and whether these may differ for the sexes. Here, by measuring metabolic and physiological outputs in Drosophila melanogaster with wild-type and mutant immune responses, we test whether the sexes are differentially impacted by these various sources of pathology and identify a critical regulator of this difference. We find that the sexes exhibit differential immune activity but similar bacteria-derived metabolic pathology. We show that femalespecific immune-inducible expression of PGRP-LB, a negative regulator of the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway, enables females to reduce immune activity in response to reductions in bacterial numbers. In the absence of PGRP-LB, females are more resistant to infection, confirming the functional importance of this regulation and suggesting that female-biased immune restriction comes at a cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available