Can community monitoring save the commons? Evidence on forest use and displacement

Rapid deforestation is a major driver of greenhouse-gas emissions (1). One proposed policy tool to halt deforestation is community forest management. Even though communities manage an increasing proportion of the world's forests, we lack good evidence of successful approaches to community forest management. Prior studies suggest that successful approaches require a number of design conditions to be met. However, causal evidence on the effectiveness of individual design conditions is scarce. This study isolates one design condition, community led monitoring of the forest, and provides causal evidence on its potential to reduce forest use. The study employs a randomized controlled trial to investigate the impact of community monitoring on forest use in 110 villages in Uganda. We explore the impact of community monitoring in both monitored and unmonitored areas of the forest, using exceptionally detailed data from on-the-ground measurements and satellite imagery. Estimates indicate that community monitoring does not affect our main outcome of interest, a forest-use index. However, treatment villages see a relative increase in forest loss outside of monitored forest areas compared to control villages. This increase is seen both in nonmonitored areas adjacent to treatment villages and in nonmonitored areas adjacent to neighboring villages not included in the study. We tentatively conclude that at least part of the increase in forest loss in nonmonitored areas is due to displacement of forest use by members of treatment villages due to fear of sanctions. Interventions to reduce deforestation should take this potentially substantial effect into consideration.

Automated summary

Rapid deforestation contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, and community forest management is proposed as a policy tool to address this issue. This study focuses on community-led forest monitoring as a design condition to potentially reduce forest use, using a randomized controlled trial in 110 villages in Uganda. The results suggest that while community monitoring did not impact overall forest use, there was an increase in forest loss outside of monitored areas, potentially due to displacement of forest use by members of monitored villages.