4.8 Article

lineage specification

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2110961118

Keywords

hydrogel; mechanical homogeneity; host-guest chemistry; stem cell; differentiation

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0908100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11934008, 11804148, 21902075]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180320]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [020414380187, 0204 14380148, 020414380138]
  5. Technological Innovation Foundation of Nanjing University [020414913413]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a method to control the mechanical homogeneity of hydrogels and found that the mechanical homogeneity is crucial for controlling the differentiation or stemness maintenance of human embryonic stem cells.
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is mechanically inhomogeneous due to the presence of a wide spectrum of biomacromolecules and hierarchically assembled structures at the nanoscale. Mechanical inhomogeneity can be even more pronounced under pathological conditions due to injury, fibrogenesis, or tumorigenesis. Although considerable progress has been devoted to engineering synthetic hydrogels to mimic the ECM, the effect of the mechanical inhomogeneity of hydrogels has been widely overlooked. Here, we develop a method based on host-guest chemistry to control the homogeneity of maleimide-thiol cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. We show that mechanical homogeneity plays an important role in controlling the differentiation or stemness maintenance of human embryonic stem cells. Inhomogeneous hydrogels disrupt actin assembly and lead to reduced YAP activation levels, while homogeneous hydrogels promote mechanotransduction. Thus, the method we developed to minimize the mechanical inhomogeneity of hydrogels may have broad applications in cell culture and tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available