4.7 Article

A study of the design and arrangement of flights in a rotary drum

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 395, Issue -, Pages 195-206

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.09.043

Keywords

Flighted rotary dryer; Active region; DEM simulation; Multi-response optimization

Funding

  1. Research Support Foundation of the state of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  3. Coordination for the Improvement ofHigher Education Personnel (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the distribution of particles in flighted rotary drums through DEM simulations and multi-response optimization to determine the most effective flight design. The optimized configuration with specific internal angles and intercalated flight positions significantly improves particle distribution uniformity and compactness in the active region compared to standard flight arrangements.
The performance of flighted rotary drums strongly depends on the distribution of the particles across the drum transverse and longitudinal sections. This work aims to determine the design and arrangement of flights that optimize the distribution of the particles in the active region. The prediction of the solids flow was investigated by DEM simulations. A multi-response optimization was performed, in which the obtained best configuration of three-segments flight presented the following internal angles: alpha(1) = 95 degrees, alpha(2) = 130 degrees, and alpha(3) = 145 degrees. The effect of the intercalated position of the flights on particles distribution in the active region was also evaluated. The configuration with the separation distance between flights of 15 degrees promoted an increase of 24.6% in the area occupied by the particles in the active region, and a reduction of 38.5% in dispersion heterogeneity of solids when compared to that of the arrangement of aligned flights. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available