4.7 Article

Parameter calibration of discrete element method modelling for cohesive and non-spherical particles of powder

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 386, Issue -, Pages 199-208

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.03.044

Keywords

DEM modelling; Parameter calibration; Coefficient of rolling friction; Surface energy

Funding

  1. Seishin Enterprise Co., Ltd.
  2. Altair Engineering, Inc.
  3. Cybernet Systems Co., Ltd.
  4. Ansys Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A calibration procedure for non-spherical cohesive particles using the DEM method is proposed in this paper, where the rolling friction coefficient and surface energy for cohesive force are calibrated based on the JKR theory. The validity of the calibrated parameters is confirmed through comparison with experimental data and mixing simulations in a V-shaped mixer, indicating their wide applicability.
Numerical analysis via the DEM has been applied to various powder processes. To obtain simulation results of high reliability, a calibration method for the input DEM parameters must be established. This paper therefore proposes a calibration procedure for non-spherical cohesive particles. The rolling friction coefficient and surface energy for cohesive force based on the JKR theory were calibrated. Initially, the dynamic angles of repose were calculated using various parameter combinations to obtain a two-dimensional contour map. Subsequently, the DEM parameters were determined by comparing them with the experimental data. Finally, the theoretical static angle of repose was calculated using the selected parameters to verify its agreement with the experimental data, which confirmed its validity. Furthermore, the validity of the calibrated parameters was evaluated by mixing simulations in a V-shaped mixer. Through the proposed calibration procedure, the DEM parameters of several materials were obtained successfully, and their wide applicability was confirmed. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available