4.5 Article

Enhancing the mechanical, morphological, and rheological behavior of polyethylene/polypropylene blends with maleic anhydride-grafted polyethylene

Journal

POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE
Volume 61, Issue 10, Pages 2487-2495

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pen.25775

Keywords

blends; compatibilization; mechanical properties; morphology; rheology

Funding

  1. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence-07 (ORF-RE-07) Program [500256]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of using MAPE to compatibilize PE-rich blends with PP as the minor phase, resulting in improved mechanical properties and reduced viscosity mismatch and interfacial tension.
This is the first study to showcase the use of maleic anhydride-grafted polyethylene (MAPE) to compatibilize polyethylene (PE)-rich blends, where polypropylene (PP) represents the minor phase. By first mixing PP with MAPE, and then adding PE, MAPE was assumed to be localized at the PE/PP interface. Microscopy analysis confirmed that MAPE led to a remarkably fine PE/PP/MAPE morphology, with PP being uniformly dispersed into PE and having an average diameter 267% smaller than that in the PE/PP blend. According to mechanical and rheological tests, this translated into a 14%, 20%, and 14% enhancement of tensile strength, tensile modulus, and tensile toughness, respectively, as well as a 10% and 20% drop in PE/PP viscosity mismatch and interfacial tension, respectively. Finally, PE/PP/MAPE tensile toughness and elongation at break were greater than those of virgin PP, while PE/PP/MAPE strength and stiffness were similar to the ones of neat PP. Therefore, this study provides industries with the possibility to utilize products rich in PE instead of those made of more expensive PP, while still keeping the level of performance high; hence, creating a paradigm shift in the development of advanced lightweight polyolefin materials with tuned functionalities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available