4.7 Article

The selection of polyethersulfone/polyvinylpyrrolidone films for industrial application using the multiple-criteria decision-making approach

Journal

POLYMER COMPOSITES
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages 6106-6115

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26288

Keywords

best-worst method (BWM); core-shell polymers; multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM); nanofiltration (NF); nanoparticles (NPs); polyethersulfone (PES); polyvinylpyrrolidone

Funding

  1. Iran University of Science and Technology
  2. Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study synthesized PES and polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated magnetic core-shell nanoparticles, prepared a range of blends, and characterized them using analysis methods.
The polyethersulfone (PES)-based composite polymers have been extensively studied for many years as the core of various scientific activities, such as fuel cell production, water treatment, reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and gas separation, which represent a significant field of research for several applications. In the present study, PES and polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated magnetic core-shell nanoparticles (NPs) are synthesized. Following this, a range of these NPs and PES blend polymers are prepared. Then, analyzing methods are used for identification and characterization of a variety of these samples. Since some properties of the samples have been improved, and others are attenuated, the best composition could not be selected from the samples without a logical process. To do so, a multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique that considers all the desired parameters is utilized. A MCDM algorithm is applied to create a ranking of alternative properties from the best to the worst, alongside mathematical calculations which accounts for the relative importance of the criteria. Results have shown that PES film with 15% of polymer-coated NPs presents the best performance based on the desired properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available