4.7 Article

Buckling analysis of graphene nanoplatelets-doped carbon/aramid hybrid polymer composite plates

Journal

POLYMER COMPOSITES
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages 5712-5720

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26253

Keywords

axial buckling; carbon; aramid intraply; epoxy; graphene nanoplatelets; lateral buckling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effects of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) on the axial and lateral buckling behavior of carbon/aramid hybrid-woven epoxy nanocomposites. The addition of GNPs resulted in enhanced critical buckling loads, with the maximum enhancement observed at 0.1 wt% GNPs. However, further addition of GNPs led to a decrease in critical buckling loads due to agglomeration. Failure surfaces were examined with scanning electron microscopy to understand the relationship between buckling behavior and failure types of the composite samples.
In the present study, the effects of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) contents on the axial and lateral buckling behavior of carbon/aramid hybrid-woven epoxy nanocomposites were investigated. The composite plates were fabricated with different concentrations of GNPs (0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 wt%) by vacuum-assisted hand lay-up method. The addition of GNPs has resulted in enhancement in axial and lateral critical buckling loads. The maximum enhancement in both axial and lateral critical buckling reached with 0.1 wt% GNPs addition. These percent enhancement values in axial critical buckling loads were 25.7%, 5.2%, and, 14% with fixed-fixed, fixed-free, and free-free boundary conditions, respectively. For lateral critical buckling load, the maximum enhancement was recorded as 20.6% compared to the pure control sample. Also, with the further addition of GNPs, critical buckling loads decreased, which is interpreted because of the agglomeration of GNPs. The failure surfaces were then observed with scanning electron microscopy to examine the link between the buckling behavior and failure types of the composite samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available