4.7 Article

Comparative study of different carbon reinforcements at different length scales on the properties of polyvinyl alcohol composites

Journal

POLYMER COMPOSITES
Volume 42, Issue 9, Pages 4239-4252

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26142

Keywords

FTIR; mechanical properties; microscopy; nanocomposites; Raman spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparative studies have been conducted on the mechanical behavior of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) polymer composites with different carbon fillers, showing that functionalized carbon nanotubes and short carbon fibers have a better distribution of second phases and can significantly increase the strength of the composites. The interaction between the functional groups of carbon nanotubes and the polymeric chain of PVA plays an important role in enhancing the mechanical properties of the composites.
Comparative studies on the mechanical behavior of the composites of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) polymer with different carbon fillers such as multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT), functionalized CNT (f-CNT), and short carbon fiber (C-f), having similar geometry (1D) but different length scale, have been carried out. Microstructural analysis reveals better distribution of second phases with f-CNT and C-f compared with MWCNT. Fourier-transform infrared spectra indicate the interaction of functional groups of CNTs with the polymeric chain of PVA. X-ray diffraction analysis shows improvement of crystallinity upon addition of carbon filler. Defect analysis of carbon reinforcement is carried out using Raman spectroscopy. The strength of the composite is increased by 138% with MWCNT reinforcement, by 201.8% with f-CNT reinforcement, and by 87.9% with C-f reinforcement. The fractographs show pullout, branching, and bridging as strengthening mechanisms for MWCNT and f-CNT in the PVA matrix, whereas mainly pullout as strengthening mechanism for C-f-PVA composite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available