4.6 Article

Identification of LecRLK gene family in Cerasus humilis through genomic-transcriptomic data mining and expression analyses

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254535

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Key Project of Shanxi Key RD Program [201703D211001-04-04, 201703D221028-4]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Project of Universities in Shanxi Province [2020L0138]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

LecRLK receptor-like protein kinases have been found to play a role in plants' responses to various stress factors. The study identified 170 LecRLK family genes in Cerasus humilis and found that nine representative genes were actively involved in salt and drought stress responses. These results provide a foundation for future functional verification of these genes and may facilitate the development of new stress-resistant Cerasus humilis cultivars.
Lectin receptor-like protein kinases (LecRLKs) have been shown to be involved in plants' responses to various biotic and abiotic stresse factors. Cerasus humilis is an important fruit species widely planted for soil and water conservation in northern China due to its strong tolerance to drought and salinity stresses. In this study, a total of 170 LecRLK family genes (125 G-types, 43 L-types and 2 C-types) were identified in the newly released whole-genome sequences of C. humilis. Furthermore, nine representative LecRLK genes in young plants of C. humilis under varying drought and salinity stresses were selected for qRT-PCR analysis. Our systematic comparative analyses revealed the active participation of these nine LecRLK genes in the salt and drought stress responses of C. humilis. The results from our study have provided a solid foundation for future functional verification of these LecRLK family genes and will likely help facilitate the more rapid and effective development of new stress resistant Cerasus humilis cultivars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available