4.6 Article

Role of Ras in regulation of intestinal epithelial cell homeostasis and crosstalk with Wnt signaling

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256774

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20K07358, 16K15219]
  2. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K07358, 16K15219] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cross talk between different signaling pathways is important for the regulation of intestinal homeostasis and tumorigenesis. Expression of active K-Ras in intestinal epithelial cells promotes proliferation and generation of goblet cells, while counter-regulating Wnt signaling for proper regulation of intestinal epithelial cell homeostasis.
Cross talk between different signaling pathways is thought to be important for regulation of homeostasis of, as well as oncogenesis of, the intestinal epithelium. Expression of an active form of K-Ras specifically in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) of mice (IEC-RasDA mice) resulted in the development of hyperplasia in the small intestine and colon of mice. IEC-RasDA mice also manifested the increased proliferation of IECs. In addition, the number of goblet cells markedly increased, while that of Paneth cells decreased in IEC-RasDA mice. Development of intestinal organoids was markedly enhanced for IEC-RasDA mice compared with control mice. Whereas, the expression of Wnt target genes was significantly reduced in the in intestinal crypts from IEC-RasDA mice compared with that apparent for the control. Our results thus suggest that K-Ras promotes the proliferation of IECs as well as generation of goblet cells. By contrast, Ras counter-regulates the Wnt signaling and thereby contribute to the proper regulation of intestinal epithelial cell homeostasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available