4.6 Article

Automatic algorithm for quantifying lung involvement in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, infection with SARS-CoV-2, paracoccidioidomycosis and no lung disease patients

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251783

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Brazilian agency named Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico -CNPQ [303509/2019-8]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo -Fapesp [2020/05539-9]
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -CAPES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed an automatic algorithm for quantifying total volume and lung impairments in different diseases, which showed good agreement with a semi-automatic algorithm. The algorithm is capable of measuring volume and differentiating various pulmonary involvements, providing reliable quantification for physicians in important lung diseases.
In this work, we aimed to develop an automatic algorithm for the quantification of total volume and lung impairments in four different diseases. The quantification was completely automatic based upon high resolution computed tomography exams. The algorithm was capable of measuring volume and differentiating pulmonary involvement including inflammatory process and fibrosis, emphysema, and ground-glass opacities. The algorithm classifies the percentage of each pulmonary involvement when compared to the entire lung volume. Our algorithm was applied to four different patients groups: no lung disease patients, patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and patients with paracoccidioidomycosis. The quantification results were compared with a semi-automatic algorithm previously validated. Results confirmed that the automatic approach has a good agreement with the semi-automatic. Bland-Altman (B&A) demonstrated a low dispersion when comparing total lung volume, and also when comparing each lung impairment individually. Linear regression adjustment achieved an R value of 0.81 when comparing total lung volume between both methods. Our approach provides a reliable quantification process for physicians, thus impairments measurements contributes to support prognostic decisions in important lung diseases including the infection of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available