4.6 Article

Reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in obese gastric cancer patients

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255855

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy can be performed safely in obese patients with gastric cancer, with comparable operative outcomes to non-obese patients.
Background Reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy is currently widely performed for patients with gastric cancer. However, its safety in obese patients has not yet been verified. This is the first study on reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RpLDG) in obese patients with gastric cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term surgical outcomes and investigate the feasibility and safety of RpLDG in obese patients with gastric carcinoma. Material and methods A total of 271 gastric cancer patients who underwent RpLDG at our institution were divided into two groups: non-obese [body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2, n = 251; NOG] and obese (BMI >= 30 kg/m2, n = 20; OG). The mean age of the enrolled patients was 64.8 +/- 11.4 years, with 72.0% being men and 28.0% women. Operative details and short-term surgical outcomes, including hospital course and postoperative complications, were compared by retrospectively reviewing the medical records. Results No significant difference in operation time was found between the NOG and OG (205.9 +/- 40.0 vs. 211.3 +/- 37.3 minutes, P = 0.563). Other operative outcomes in the OG, including estimated blood loss (54.1 +/- 86.1 vs. 54.0 +/- 39.0 mL, P = 0.995) and retrieved lymph nodes (36.2 +/- 16.4 vs. 35.5 +/- 18.2, P = 0.875), were not inferior to those in the NOG. There were also no statistical differences in short-term surgical outcomes, including the incidence of surgical complications (13.9% vs. 10.0%, P = 1). Conclusion RpLDG can be performed safely in obese gastric cancer patients by an experienced surgeon. It should be considered a feasible alternative to conventional port distal gastrectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available