4.6 Article

Domestic laundry and microfiber pollution: Exploring fiber shedding from consumer apparel textiles

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250346

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MEC
  2. REI
  3. Arc'teryx
  4. Patagonia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies show that home laundry may be an important source of microfiber pollution, as textiles lose a significant amount of microfibers after multiple wash cycles, with synthetic fibers releasing more than natural fibers; the use of laundry lint traps can reduce microfiber emissions, and there is a vast difference in microfiber loss between low-shedding textiles and high-shedding textiles.
Synthetic fibers are increasingly seen to dominate microplastic pollution profiles in aquatic environments, with evidence pointing to textiles as a potentially important source. However, the loss of microfibers from textiles during laundry is poorly understood. We evaluated microfiber release from a variety of synthetic and natural consumer apparel textile samples (n = 37), with different material types, constructions, and treatments during five consecutive domestic laundry cycles. Microfiber loss ranged from 9.6 mg to 1,240 mg kg(-1) of textile per wash, or an estimated 8,809 to > 6,877,000 microfibers. Mechanically-treated polyester samples, dominated by fleeces and jerseys, released six times more microfibers (161 +/- 173 mg kg(-1) per wash) than did nylon samples with woven construction and filamentous yarns (27 +/- 14 mg kg(-1) per wash). Fiber shedding was positively correlated with fabric thickness for nylon and polyester. Interestingly, cotton and wool textiles also shed large amounts of microfibers (165 +/- 44 mg kg(-1) per wash). The similarity between the average width of textile fibers here (12.4 +/- 4.5 mu m) and those found in ocean samples provides support for the notion that home laundry is an important source of microfiber pollution. Evaluation of two marketed laundry lint traps provided insight into intervention options for the home, with retention of up to 90% for polyester fibers and 46% for nylon fibers. Our observation of a > 850-fold difference in the number of microfibers lost between low and high shedding textiles illustrates the strong potential for intervention, including more sustainable clothing design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available