4.7 Review

Regulatory hubs and strategies for improving heavy metal tolerance in plants: Chemical messengers, omics and genetic engineering

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages 260-278

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.05.006

Keywords

Chemical messengers; Genome editing; Genetic engineering; Metal tolerance; Omics

Categories

Funding

  1. UGC-startup grant [F. 30-482/2019 (BSR)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heavy metal accumulation in agricultural soil poses a major threat to plant growth, but chemical messengers play a crucial role in mitigating toxicity. Understanding the interactions of genes, metabolites, and proteins associated with heavy metal toxicity is essential for deciphering the regulatory mechanisms of heavy metal tolerance.
Heavy metal (HM) accumulation in the agricultural soil and its toxicity is a major threat for plant growth and development. HMs disrupt functional integrity of the plants, induces altered phenological and physiological responses and slashes down qualitative crop yield. Chemical messengers such as phytohormones, plant growth regulators and gasotransmitters play a crucial role in regulating plant growth and development under metal toxicity in plants. Understanding the intricate network of these chemical messengers as well as interactions of genes/metabolites/proteins associated with HM toxicity in plants is necessary for deciphering insights into the regulatory circuit involved in HM tolerance. The present review describes (a) the role of chemical messengers in HM-induced toxicity mitigation, (b) possible crosstalk between phytohormones and other signaling cascades involved in plants HM tolerance and (c) the recent advancements in biotechnological interventions including genetic engineering, genome editing and omics approaches to provide a step ahead in making of improved plant against HM toxicities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available