4.7 Article

Effects of Host Plant Resistance and Fungicide Applications on Ascochyta Blight Symptomology and Yield of Chickpea

Journal

PLANT DISEASE
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 247-253

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-06-21-1252-RE

Keywords

Ascochyta rabiei; chickpea; fungicide; resistance; variety

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture
  2. BASF Corp
  3. Bayer Crop Science
  4. Syngenta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ascochyta blight is a major threat to chickpea production worldwide. This study found that using resistant cultivars is essential for disease control and maximizing yield, while fungicide applications alone are not enough.
Ascochyta blight (AB), caused by the pathogen Ascochyta rabiei, is a major threat to chickpea production worldwide, causing major yield losses and decreasing quality. Control of AB requires integrating pest management options including resistant cultivars and fungicide applications. To address this, fungicides with different modes of action were evaluated on three chickpea cultivars with differing levels of susceptibility to AB under irrigated and dryland conditions in 2015 to 2017. The fungicides were applied once or twice and compared with a no-fungicide application control on AB score and yield. The mean grain yields across locations and years were 1,753, 1,283, and 981 kg/ha, with a corresponding AB mean score of 2.6, 3.2, and 3.3 on 0 to 7 scale (where 0 is no disease and 7 is completely dead) for the moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, and susceptible chickpea cultivars, respectively. Fungicide application was not enough to control disease throughout the season. The use of AB-resistant cultivars had the most significant impact on minimizing the disease and maximizing yield, irrespective of year and location. This study supports previous research indicating that planting AB-resistant chickpea cultivars is essential for disease control, regardless of the fungicides applied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available