4.4 Article

RF sheath induced sputtering on Proto-MPEX. I. Sheath equivalent dielectric layer for modeling the RF sheath

Journal

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0054074

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The text discusses the use of an RF helicon antenna with an aluminum nitride ceramic window in the pulsed linear plasma device Proto-MPEX, and how the RF sheath created under the antenna affects impurity production rates. By coupling different models to study impurity production and transportation, the novel method can model impurity generation and transport across different length scales, providing insights for various plasma physics studies.
The pulsed linear plasma device Prototype Material Plasma Exposure eXperiment (Proto-MPEX) uses a radio frequency (RF) helicon antenna with an aluminum nitride ceramic window for plasma production. The RF sheath created under the helicon antenna is sufficient to cause ion impact energies to be greater than the sputtering threshold of the AlN helicon window material and for impurities to be created. Here, we investigate the RF sheath on the inner diameter of the helicon window and its impact on the impurity production rates in Proto-MPEX. Three models-a 3D COMSOL finite element RF model of the Proto-MPEX helicon region, a rectified DC sheath potential model, and the 3D Global Impurity TRansport code-are coupled together to study impurity production and transportation. This novel method of impurity generation and transport modeling spans length scales ranging from the sheath (millimeters or less) up to the full device (meters) and can be applied to other radio frequency sources and antennas in a wide range of plasma physics studies, including basic plasmas, low-temperature processing plasmas, plasma thrusters, and fusion plasmas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available