4.5 Article

Four superhard sp3 hybrid cubic boron nitride polymorphs: A first principles calculations

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS A
Volume 400, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127325

Keywords

First principles calculations; Crystal structures; Boron nitride; Superhard materials

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52002118, 12004016]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1234]
  3. Department of Education of Hebei Province [CXZZBS2020056]
  4. Key Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province [192102210009]
  5. Open Fund of Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of High-end Structural Materials [hsm1903]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study proposed four sp(3) hybrid boron nitride polymorphs that are stable at ambient conditions, more stable under high pressure conditions, and have the potential of being superhard materials with wide band gap semiconductor structures with direct band gap.
In this study, four sp(3) hybrid boron nitride polymorphs were proposed based on first principles calculations. The calculation results indicated that, at ambient conditions, four polymorphs are stable based on the criteria of dynamic and mechanical stability. At ambient conditions, they are thermodynamically metastable than h-BN, but more stable under high pressure conditions. In these four boron nitride phases, atoms are assembled in cubic symmetry, which are all sp(3) hybrid cubic diamond-like structures, and the results showed that the Vickers hardness of them are as hard as c-BN, indicating they are potential superhard materials. Meanwhile, these four structures are considered as wide band gap semiconductor structures with direct band gap. Therefore, these four boron nitride structures have great potential as photovoltaic electronic devices and cutting tools. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available