4.6 Article

Reconstruction, analysis and interpretation of posterior probability distributions of PET images, using the posterior bootstrap

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac06e1

Keywords

PET image reconstruction; PET; MRI; posterior probability distribution; posterior bootstrap; uncertainty quantification; Bayesian inference; multimodal image reconstruction

Funding

  1. ITMO Cancer (France) [ANR-11-INBS-0006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces an easy-to-use methodology for assessing uncertainty in Bayesian models for PET image reconstruction and provides detailed analysis and interpretation of posterior image distributions. The coverage properties of posterior distributions are validated, offering more insight for incorporating uncertainty information into diagnostic and quantification tasks.
The uncertainty of reconstructed PET images remains difficult to assess and to interpret for the use in diagnostic and quantification tasks. Here we provide (1) an easy-to-use methodology for uncertainty assessment for almost any Bayesian model in PET reconstruction from single datasets and (2) a detailed analysis and interpretation of produced posterior image distributions. We apply a recent posterior bootstrap framework to the PET image reconstruction inverse problem and obtain simple parallelizable algorithms based on random weights and on existing maximum a posteriori (MAP) (posterior maximum) optimization-based algorithms. Posterior distributions are produced, analyzed and interpreted for several common Bayesian models. Their relationship with the distribution of the MAP image estimate over multiple dataset realizations is exposed. The coverage properties of posterior distributions are validated. More insight is obtained for the interpretation of posterior distributions in order to open the way for including uncertainty information into diagnostic and quantification tasks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available