4.8 Article

Critical Energy Dissipation in a Binary Superfluid Gas by a Moving Magnetic Obstacle

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 127, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.095302

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Samsung Science and Technology Foundation [SSTF-BA1601-06]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2018R1A2B3003373, NRF-2019M3E4A1080400]
  3. Institute for Basic Science in Korea [IBS-R009-D1]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019M3E4A1080400] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the critical energy dissipation in an atomic superfluid gas with symmetric spin components, induced by an oscillating magnetic obstacle. Spin-wave excitations and half-quantum vortices (HQVs) are generated as the frequency increases, demonstrating a transition from spin-wave emission to HQV shedding in the dissipative dynamics. Further investigation using pulsed linear motion of the obstacle reveals two critical velocities for creating HQVs with different core magnetization.
We study the critical energy dissipation in an atomic superfluid gas with two symmetric spin components by an oscillating magnetic obstacle. Above a certain critical oscillation frequency, spin-wave excitations are generated by the magnetic obstacle, demonstrating the spin superfluid behavior of the system. When the obstacle is strong enough to cause density perturbations via local saturation of spin polarization, half-quantum vortices (HQVs) are created for higher oscillation frequencies, which reveals the characteristic evolution of critical dissipative dynamics from spin-wave emission to HQV shedding. Critical HQV shedding is further investigated using a pulsed linear motion of the obstacle, and we identify two critical velocities to create HQVs with different core magnetization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available