4.8 Article

Deep Search for Decaying Dark Matter with XMM-Newton Blank-Sky Observations

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.051101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE Early Career Grant [DESC0019225]
  2. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science at the University of California, Berkeley
  4. NSF [ACI-1450310, OAC-1836650, OAC-1841471]
  5. Moore-Sloan Data Science Environment at NYU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sterile neutrinos in the keV range are potential explanations for dark matter and neutrino masses, and this study presents the most sensitive search yet for decaying dark matter scenarios across a specific mass range using XMM-Newton data.
Sterile neutrinos with masses in the keV range are well-motivated extensions to the Standard Model that could explain the observed neutrino masses while also making up the dark matter (DM) of the universe. If sterile neutrinos are DM then they may slowly decay into active neutrinos and photons, giving rise to the possibility of their detection through narrow spectral features in astrophysical x-ray data sets. In this Letter, we perform the most sensitive search to date for this and other decaying DM scenarios across the mass range from 5 to 16 keV using archival XMM-Newton data. We reduce 547 Ms of data from both the MOS and PN instruments using observations taken across the full sky and then use this data to search for evidence of DM decay in the ambient halo of the Milky Way. We determine the instrumental and astrophysical baselines with data taken far away from the Galactic Center, and use Gaussian process modeling to capture additional continuum background contributions. No evidence is found for unassociated x-ray lines, leading us to produce the strongest constraints to date on decaying DM in this mass range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available