4.8 Article

Averaging Local Structure to Predict the Dynamic Propensity in Supercooled Liquids

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 127, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.088007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [16DDS004, VI.VIDI.192.102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The key structural ingredient to predicting the local dynamics of supercooled liquids is the ability to consider both the local structure around a central particle and averaged structural features centered around nearby particles. This insight has been exploited to design a significantly more efficient model with essentially the same predictive power but with a fraction of the computational complexity.
Predicting the local dynamics of supercooled liquids based purely on local structure is a key challenge in our quest for understanding glassy materials. Recent years have seen an explosion of methods for making such a prediction, often via the application of increasingly complex machine learning techniques. The best predictions so far have involved so-called Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) whose accuracy comes at a cost of models that involve on the order of 105 fit parameters. In this Letter, we propose that the key structural ingredient to the GNN method is its ability to consider not only the local structure around a central particle, but also averaged structural features centered around nearby particles. We demonstrate that this insight can be exploited to design a significantly more efficient model that provides essentially the same predictive power at a fraction of the computational complexity (approximately 1000 fit parameters), and demonstrate its success by fitting the dynamic propensity of Kob-Andersen and binary hard-sphere mixtures. We then use this to make predictions regarding the importance of radial and angular descriptors in the dynamics of both models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available