4.8 Article

Search for Light Dark Matter-Electron Scattering in the PandaX-II Experiment

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 126, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.211803

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science and Technology, Shanghai Municipal Government [18JC1410200]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0400301]
  3. National Science Foundation of China [12005131, 11905128, 12090061, 11775141]
  4. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2020YFSY0057]
  5. Double First Class Plan of the Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  6. Chinese Academy of Sciences Center for Excellence in Particle Physics (CCEPP)
  7. Hongwen Foundation in Hong Kong
  8. Tencent Foundation in China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the PandaX-II liquid xenon detector, constraints on light dark matter interactions with shell electrons have been reported, with the world's most stringent exclusion limit on the scattering cross section within the dark matter mass range from 15 to 30 MeV/c(2).
We report constraints on light dark matter through its interactions with shell electrons in the PandaX-II liquid xenon detector with a total 46.9 tonnes/day exposure. To effectively search for these very low energy electron recoils, ionization-only signals are selected from the data. 1821 candidates are identified within an ionization signal range between 50 and 75 photoelectrons, corresponding to a mean electronic recoil energy from 0.08 to 0.15 keV. The 90% C.L. exclusion limit on the scattering cross section between the dark matter and electron is calculated with systematic uncertainties properly taken into account. Under the assumption of point interaction, we provide the world's most stringent limit within the dark matter mass range from 15 to 30 MeV/c(2), with the corresponding cross section from 2.5 x 10(-37) to 3.1 x 10(-38) cm(2).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available