4.5 Article

Characterizing knee loading asymmetry in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using inertial sensors

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 114-119

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.06.021

Keywords

ACL reconstruction; Gait impairments; Knee extensor moment; Shank angular velocity; Inertial sensors

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K12 HD0055929, R24 HD05688]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Limitations in the ability to identify knee extensor loading deficits during gait in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) may underlie their persistence. A recent study suggested that shank angular velocity, directly output from inertial sensors, differed during gait between individuals post-ACLr and controls. However, it is not clear if this kinematic variable relates to knee moments calculated using joint kinematics and ground reaction forces. Heel rocker mechanics during loading response of gait, characterized by rapid shank rotation, require knee extensor control. Measures of shank angular velocity may be reflective of knee moments. This study investigated the relationship between shank angular velocity and knee extensor moment during gait in individuals (n = 19) 96.7 +/- 16.8 days post-ACLr. Gait was assessed concurrently using inertial sensors and a marker-based motion system with force platforms. Peak shank angular velocity and knee extensor moment were strongly correlated (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) and between limb ratios of angular velocity predicted between limb ratios of extensor moment (r(2) = 0.57, p < 0.001) in the absence of between limb differences in spatiotemporal gait parameters. The strength of these relationships indicate that shank kinematic data offer meaningful information regarding knee loading and provide a potential alternative to full motion analysis systems for identification of altered knee loading following ACLr. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available