4.2 Article

Classic Psychedelic Coadministration with Lithium, but Not Lamotrigine, is Associated with Seizures: An Analysis of Online Psychedelic Experience Reports

Journal

PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 240-245

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-1524-2794

Keywords

psychedelic; lithium; hallucinogen; harm; risks

Funding

  1. philanthropic - Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation
  2. NIDA [T32DA07209]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of classic psychedelics with mood stabilizers, particularly lithium, may significantly increase the risk of seizures, as indicated by reports analyzed from online forums. Further research is needed to fully understand the potential risks and interactions.
Introduction Psychedelics show promise in treating unipolar depression, though patients with bipolar disorder have been excluded from recent psychedelic trials. There is limited information on the use of classic psychedelics (e.g., LSD or psilocybin) in individuals using mood stabilizers to treat bipolar disorder. This is important to know, as individuals with bipolar depression may attempt to treat themselves with psychedelics while on a mood stabilizer, particularly given enthusiastic media reports of the efficacy of psilocybin for depression. Methods This study analyzed reports of classic psychedelics administered with mood stabilizers from 3 websites (Erowid.org, Shroomery.org, and Reddit.com). Results Strikingly, 47% of 62 lithium plus psychedelic reports involved seizures, and an additional 18% resulted in bad trips while none of 34 lamotrigine reports did. Further, 39% of lithium reports involved medical attention. Most of the lamotrigine reports (65%) but few (8%) of the lithium reports were judged to not affect the psychedelic experience. Discussion Although further research is needed, we provisionally conclude that psychedelic use may pose a significant seizure risk for patients on lithium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available