4.5 Article

Sex differences in the discriminative stimulus characteristics of a morphine occasion setter in rats

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 205, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173173

Keywords

Drug discrimination; Occasion setter; Dose generalization; Sex differences; Opioids; Pavlovian conditioning

Funding

  1. Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [RGPIN-2019-05147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that female rats were more sensitive to the stimulus effects of morphine and exhibited significant gender differences in dose generalization testing, highlighting the need to reassess the impact of drug stimuli on associative behaviors between genders.
The current study investigated whether the stimulus effects of morphine can function as a positive and negative feature in a Pavlovian occasion setting drug discrimination preparation in male and female rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to a feature positive (FP) or feature negative (FN) training group and all received intermixed morphine (3.2 mg/kg, IP) or saline injections 15 min before 20-min daily training sessions. For FP rats, on morphine sessions, each of eight 15-s white noise (WN) presentations was followed by 4-s access to sucrose (0.01 ml, 26% w/v); on saline sessions, sucrose was withheld. FN rats learned the reverse contingency. FP discrimination was acquired somewhat sooner than FN discrimination, and females, but not males, became sensitized to the locomotor effects of morphine, which did not influence conditioned responding. Rats then entered dose generalization testing. There was no sex difference in dose generalization for FN groups (ED50 1.26 for males and 1.57 for females). Yet for FP rats, the dose response curve for females was shifted to the right compared to males (ED50 0.54 for males and 1.94 for females). FP females exhibited enhanced responding at a dose higher than that of their original training. These findings reveal the need to reassess our notions of drug stimuli that guide appropriate associative behaviours from the perspective of sex differences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available