4.1 Article

Echocardiographic Parameters Predictive of Poor Outcome in Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn (PPHN): Preliminary Results

Journal

PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 1848-1853

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02677-z

Keywords

Pulmonary hypertension; Newborn; Prognosis; Echocardiography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study was to describe echocardiographic parameters in neonates with PH and identify predictors of short-term outcome deterioration. The study found a strong link between right-to-left shunt and death. It is recommended to repeat echocardiography after basic therapeutic optimization for prognostic purposes.
The aim is to conduct a pilot study to prospectively describe echocardiographic parameters in neonates with pulmonary hypertension (PH) managed according to current recommendations and to identify those parameters that could predict worsening of short-term outcomes. All neonates less than 28 days old with a diagnosis of PH were prospectively enrolled in a tertiary care center for 1 year. Two echocardiograms were performed by a trained neonatologist. The first echocardiogram was performed at the time of diagnosis, whereas the second was performed just after basic therapeutic optimization. The cohort included 27 neonates. Mean gestational age at birth was 36.1 weeks gestational age (WGA) (SD: 4) and mean birth weight was 2658 g (SD: 907). Six neonates (22%) died before day 28, with a median age at death of 48 h (IQR [33; 89]). Although the first echocardiogram showed no difference, the second highlighted a strong link between the persistence of right-to left-shunt and death (p = 0.002). We showed a link between right-to-left shunt and a poor outcome (death or morbidity) after therapeutic optimization among premature and full-term neonates suffering from PH. We recommend repeating echocardiography after basic therapeutic optimization and for prognostic purposes, taking into account only the second examination. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available