4.7 Article

Scalable multi-label canonical correlation analysis for cross-modal retrieval

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107905

Keywords

Canonical correlation analysis; Semantic transformation; Cross-modal retrieval; Singular value decomposition

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61806097, 61602248]
  2. Academy of Finland [316765, 328115]
  3. Infotech Oulu
  4. China Scholarship Council
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [328115, 328115] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a novel framework is proposed to integrate semantic correlation and feature correlation for cross-modal retrieval. By using semantic transformation, the model avoids explicitly computing the covariance matrix, which leads to a huge saving of computational cost. Experimental results demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method on three multi-label datasets.
Multi-label canonical correlation analysis (ml-CCA) has been developed for cross-modal retrieval. However, the computation of ml-CCA involves dense matrices eigendecomposition, which can be computationally expensive. In addition, ml-CCA only takes semantic correlation into account which ignores the cross-modal feature correlation. In this paper, we propose a novel framework to simultaneously integrate the semantic correlation and feature correlation for cross-modal retrieval. By using the semantic transformation, we show that our model can avoid computing the covariance matrix explicitly which is a huge save of computational cost. Further analysis shows that our proposed method can be solved via singular value decomposition which has linear time complexity. Experimental results on three multi-label datasets have demonstrated the accuracy and efficiency of our proposed method. ? 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available