4.5 Article

Cancer patient knowledge about and behavioral intentions after germline genome sequencing

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages 707-718

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.004

Keywords

Genome sequencing; Cancer; Knowledge; Behavior intention; Correlates

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia Project Grant [ID1124749]
  2. Cancer Institute of New South Wales (CINSW) [MB00352]
  3. NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship [APP1121630]
  4. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship, Level B [ID1078523]
  5. CINSW Career Development Fellowship [CDF171109]
  6. NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship [APP1104364]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Germline genome sequencing (GS) is important in cancer diagnosis and risk management. This study explores the knowledge and behavioral change intentions of individuals and their relatives regarding GS. The results show that increasing GS knowledge and targeting specific populations can lead to improved cancer outcomes.
Objectives: Germline genome sequencing (GS) is becoming mainstream in cancer diagnosis and risk management. Identifying knowledge gaps and determinants of health behavior change intentions will enable effective targeting of educational and management strategies to translate genomic findings into improved cancer outcomes. Methods: Probands diagnosed with cancer of likely genetic origin that consented to but not yet undergone GS, and their biological relatives, completed a cross-sectional questionnaire assessing GS knowledge and hypothetical intention to change behaviors. Results: Probands (n = 348; 57% university educated) and relatives (n = 213; 38% university educated) had moderate GS knowledge levels, with greater knowledge associated with higher education. Both populations reported high behavioral change intentions, significantly associated with being female (p = 0.01) and greater perceived importance of GS (p < 0.001), and for probands: being from English-speaking households (p = 0.003), higher socio-economic status (p = 0.01) and greater self-efficacy (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Increasing GS knowledge will enable realistic participant expectations surrounding germline GS. Actual behavior change should be monitored to determine whether increased cancer risk knowledge results in altered cancer-related behavior and ultimately, cancer outcomes. Practice implications: Educational resources should target specific populations to ensure informed decision making and expectation management. Support tools facilitating and maintaining behavioral change may be needed to achieve improved cancer patient outcomes. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available