4.2 Article

Parametric Assessment of the Effect of Cochlear Implant Positioning on Brain MRI Artefacts at 3 T

Journal

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 10, Pages E1449-E1456

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003281

Keywords

Cochlear implants; Image artefact; Magnetic resonance imaging; Surgical planning

Funding

  1. Nottingham Hospitals Charity grant
  2. University of Nottingham
  3. National Institute for Health Research
  4. Cochlear Europe Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the impact of cochlear implant (CI) positioning on brain magnetic resonance imaging artefacts. It found that the most postero-inferior CI positions resulted in the smallest apparent artefacts, while artefacts severely limited pathology detection in the ipsilateral temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes. Certain CI locations appeared to spare ipsilateral structures selectively, showing potential for informing surgical planning.
Background: Brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cochlear implants (CIs) is impacted by image artefacts. Hypothesis: The optimal positioning of the CI to minimize artefacts is unknown. This study aimed to characterize the dependence of the extent and distribution of the artefact on CI positioning. Methods: Three normally hearing individuals underwent magnetic resonance imaging using a standard T1-weighted 3D sequence. Scans were acquired with a non-functioning CI placed underneath a swimming cap at four plausible scalp positions on each side, and without the CI in situ. The artefact in each image was assessed quantitatively using voxel-based techniques. Two radiologists also independently rated the likely impact of the artefact on the detection of pathology for 20 neuroradiological locations. Results: The procedure was well tolerated. The most postero-inferior CI positions resulted in the smallest apparent artefacts. Radiological evaluations suggested that artefacts would likely limit pathology detection in the ipsilateral temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes, regardless of CI location. Pathology detection in contralateral structures and anterior corpus callosum was rarely affected. Certain CI locations appeared to selectively spare ipsilateral structures, for example, postero-inferior CI locations selectively spared ipsilateral midbrain, deep grey matter, and frontal lobes. Conclusion: A CI placed under a swimming cap is a feasible tool for observing the effect of CI location on image usability within a single subject and potentially informing surgical planning. Regardless of CI placement, artefacts involving ipsilateral parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes severely limited diagnostic image utility. Between 35% and 70% of neuroradiological features were deemed unaffected by the implant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available