4.5 Article

Otolaryngologist Performance in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System in 2018

Journal

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
Volume 166, Issue 5, Pages 858-861

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1177/01945998211032896

Keywords

MIPS; APM; value-based payment; Medicare; payment reform

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2017, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services moved clinicians to MIPS, with increased requirements and thresholds in 2018. Otolaryngologists reporting as individuals in 2018 were less likely to receive positive payment adjustments compared to groups or alternative payment models. Transitioning from individual reporting to participating in alternative payment models resulted in the greatest performance score improvements.
In 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services transitioned clinicians to the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), the largest mandatory pay-for-performance program in health care history. The first full MIPS program year was 2018, during which the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services raised participation requirements and performance thresholds. Using publicly available Medicare data, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of otolaryngologist participation and performance in the MIPS in 2017 and 2018. In 2018, otolaryngologists reporting as individuals were less likely (P < .001) to earn positive payment adjustments (n = 1076/1584, 67.9%) than those participating as groups (n = 2802/2804, 99.9%) or in alternative payment models (n = 1705/1705, 100.0%). Approximately one-third (n = 1286/4472, 28.8%) of otolaryngologists changed reporting affiliations between 2017 and 2018. Otolaryngologists who transitioned from reporting as individuals to participating in alternative payment models (n = 137, 3.1%) achieved the greatest performance score improvements (median change, +23.4 points; interquartile range, 12.0-65.5). These findings have important implications for solo and independent otolaryngology practices in the era of value-based care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available