4.7 Article

The application of fully unmanned robotic systems for inspection of subsea pipelines

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 235, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109214

Keywords

Automation; Inspection; Marine robotics; Underwater structures; Unmanned underwater technology; Underwater vehicles

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on recent innovations in external remote subsea pipeline inspection methods, specifically highlighting the unmanned method of using AUV and USV for inspections. Results from a recent project are presented, showing how automated workflows were integrated with existing hardware and software to operate AUV from shore remotely.
This paper focuses on recent innovations in the methods used for external remote subsea pipeline inspection. An unmanned method is revealed, in which an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV), paired with an Unmanned Surface Vessel (USV) was utilised to complete inspections. Results are presented from a recent project, in which existing hardware and software were integrated and combined with automated workflows to form a solution, involving an AUV operated from a USV, with operations remotely controlled from shore. As inspection data was acquired, self-actuating workflows ran onboard the AUV, enabling data processing tasks to commence and QC messages/alerts to be transmitted to the control centre, this allowed execution of in-water mission adjustments. The primary focus of this paper is on the development and implementation of an automated, fully unmanned system for subsea inspection operations. Initially, a brief review is presented of recent developments in this field. Links are drawn between these wider developments and progress made within the project, and areas are highlighted where further work is required for realisation of a comprehensive unmanned pipeline inspection solution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available